Am I a tolerable master of the sciences? Have I gone through the very gate of them, logic? If not, I am not likely to go much farther when I stumble at the threshold...Rather, have not my stupid indolence and laziness made me very ready to believe, what the little wits and pretty gentlemen affirm, "that logic is good for nothing?" It is good for this at least,...to make people talk less; by showing them both is, and what is not, to the point; and how extremely hard it is to prove any thing. Do I understand metaphysics; if not the depths of the Schoolmen, the subtleties of Scotus or Aquinas, yet the first rudiments, the general principles, of that useful science? Have I conquered so much of it, as to clear my apprehension and range my ideas under the proper heads; so much as enables me to read with ease and pleasure, as well as profit, Dr. Henry Moore's Works, Malbranche's "Search for Truth," and Dr. Clarke's "Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God?"
Wesley's vision of a pastor is remarkable: a gentleman, skilled in the Scriptures and conversant with history, philosophy and the science of his day. How do the pastors graduating from our seminaries compare to this model?
Taken from Moreland and Craig, Philosophical Foundations For a Christian Worldview, p. 4
3 comments:
Hear Hear! I taught a science class for pastors and it was very frustrating. We should not be of this world but to be close minded because you THINK it might conflict with the Bible is wacky!
I can imagine such a class might be frustrating. Those same people are just as close-minded (and frustrating) in the seminary classroom, too.
Sad...
I love Moreland, it's good to hear him being talked about. What an amazing day it would be if everyone on all sides would listen to each other and think about it.
Post a Comment